Truth and Liberty
Your Subtitle text
9/11








 



 









 



Click to get your own widget


9/11

Summary

  • Governments throughout history have used false-flag attacks as a pretext for overseas wars and increased national security.
  • 9/11 was a false-flag attack; an “inside job”.
    • The air defense system was deliberately disabled.
    • Explosives were used to bring down the 3 World Trade Center buildings.
  • 9/11 was carried out as a pretext for the “War on Terror” which would enable:
    • The invasions/occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq.
    • The Patriot Act and other legislation which demolishes basic civil liberties in the name of increased security.
    • Increased centralization of political power.
    • Increased military/intelligence/security budgets.
    • Increased globalization.
Contents

Introduction
- False-Flag Attacks
- The Official Story of 9/11
- The Alternative Theory of 9/11

The Destruction of the World Trade Center
- The Design of the World Trade Center
- The Controlled Demolition Model
- Molten Metal
- The Official Theories

(This page is not yet finished)



False-Flag Attacks

9/11 was a false-flag attack.  History is filled with examples of false-flag attacks.

False-flag attacks are an example of the technique of Problem-Reaction-Solution by which governments increase their power and control. 


The Official Story of 9/11

The official explanation of 9/11 can be broadly stated as follows:

"Without warning, 19 Islamic extremists, equipped with knives and box-cutters, hijacked four airplanes. They flew Flight 11 into WTC1, Flight 175 into WTC2 and Flight 77 into the Pentagon. Flight 93 was crashed after passengers tried to storm the cockpit. Jet-fuel fires caused WTC1 and WTC2 to collapse. WTC7 later also collapsed due to fire. No one outside the terrorist organisation Al Qaeda was involved or knew in advance."

Numerous questions arise from this explanation.  In particular:
  • What went wrong within the intelligence/security services? How did they fail to prevent the attacks?
  • What happened at NORAD? How could four hijacked planes penetrate the world’s largest and most advanced air defense system?
  • What happened at the WTC? How could three buildings, specifically designed to withstand plane impacts and fires, fail so quickly and so completely?

The Alternative Theory


When the answers to these key questions about the official story are considered and compared to the evidence of what we know happened, an alternative theory emerges which appears to better explain the facts.  This alternative theory can be broadly stated as follows:

"Four planes were hijacked and NORAD was made ineffective so they were not shot down. Flight 11 was flown into WTC1, Flight 175 into WTC2 and Flight 77 into the Pentagon. Flight 93 was shot down. Explosives brought down WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7. The hijackers were able to make their preparations because intelligence/security services had been made to back off; any warnings received were ignored."

Confronted with this alternative theory - that 9/11 was an inside job - many questions and objections arise such as:
  • Why would “insiders” do this? Who are they? What was their motive? How could they be so immoral? How could they be so bold and think they could pull it off?
  • Why/how is the mainstream media supporting a lie? How come so many experts support the official story? Why don’t America’s enemies (or allies) expose the lie?
  • What about whistleblowers?
  • Haven’t the events of 9/11 been thoroughly investigated?  Haven’t we got proof that Al Qaeda alone were involved?
The questions all relate to HOW, WHO and WHY.  But any investigation of a crime must begin by asking WHAT actually happened. 

If the evidence shows that 9/11 must have been an inside job, then all these questions and objections must have answers.  They should be explored only after one is certain about WHAT happened.


The Destruction of the World Trade Center

No steel-framed skyscraper has ever completely collapsed either before or after 9/11, except by controlled demolition.  On 9/11, three skyscrapers completely collapsed, apparently due to fire.

The World Trade Center Twin Towers were designed to withstand multiple airliner impacts, and intense fires.  In 1975, WTC1 suffered a 6-floor, 3 hour fire and suffered only minor damage.

World Trade Center Building 7 was not even hit by a plane; it apparently collapsed entirely due to fire.

Other skyscrapers have experienced far hotter, longer-lasting and bigger fires than seen on 9/11, and none of them collapsed:
    • First Interstate Bank, Los Angeles, May 1988, 3.5 hours
    • Parque Central, Caracas, Venezuela, Oct 2004, 17 hours
    • Windsor Tower, Madrid, Feb 2005, 20 hours

 
First Interstate Bank, Los Angeles, May 1988, 3.5 hours


Parque Central, Caracas, Venezuela, Oct 2004, 17 hours


Windsor Tower, Madrid, Feb 2005, 20 hours

Compare these fires to those seen in the Twin Towers on 9/11.  The Twin Towers fires were cooler (blacker smoke and red-orange flames), smaller (neither Tower burned over more than 6 floors), and shorter (102mins (WTC1) and 56mins (WTC2)).


World Trade Center Twin Towers, 9/11, 102mins (WTC1) and 56mins (WTC2)


The Design of the World Trade Center

The Twin Towers’ “tube-in-a-tube” design was new in the 1970s, but has been much copied since.  Each of the Twin Towers contained 47 steel core columns, 110 steel floor trusses, and 216 perimeter columns.

The 47 core columns were each over 3 feet wide, interlocked with lateral and diagonal beams; they held the building up.  The 216 perimeter columns were over 2 feet wide and built in sets of 3; they held up the floors.  The floors were steel, covered in concrete.















The Controlled Demolition Model

The scientific method involves comparing hypotheses to observations.  The observations of the destruction of the Twin Towers match exactly the model of controlled demolition.  In particular, the following characteristics, typical of controlled demolition, were observed in the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7:
  1. Sudden and rapid onset of collapse
  2. Vertical fall: no toppling
  3. Symmetrical debris field
  4. Almost free-fall speed
  5. Total collapse: no core columns left standing
  6. Sliced steel
  7. Pulverization of concrete and other materials
  8. Mushroom-shaped dust clouds and pyroclastic flow
  9. Horizontal debris emissions (“squibs”)
  10. Sounds of explosions and flashes throughout the building prior to collapse
  11. Molten metal in rubble
None of these characteristics would be expected with a collapse induced by fire.

All of these characteristics can be seen in videos and pictures of the events:



















The Twin Towers fell in approximately 11 and 13 seconds;
this would appear to violate the Law of Conservation of Momentum

Shredded steel and dust was blasted upwards and outwards;
this breaks the Law of Conservation of Energy

What has blasted these steel perimeter sections?
Where did the energy to do this come from?

 
Pyroclastic dust clouds covered Manhattan;
all the concrete and all the office equipment was turned to dust
 

The top section of WTC2 appears here to break
the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum


Explosive squibs can be seen below the collapse line;
dust mushroomed symmetrically


Explosive squibs can clearly be seen coming from the center of all four sides,
well below the collapse line.


Hundreds of eyewitnesses describe explosions throughout the building, prior to and during the collapses. Witnesses reported experiencing:
  • Explosions in the basement before the first plane hit.
  • Explosions in the ground floor lobby.
  • Explosions throughout the buildings while they burned.
  • Explosions throughout the collapses.

Molten Metal

Molten metal can be seen flowing from WTC2, and was present in the rubble, keeping Ground Zero hot for months.  The temperature of the fires, even days after the event, was higher than is possible with jet-fuel fires.


Molten metal pouring out of the impact point on WTC2.
This is not aluminum, and the fires were not hot enough to melt steel.


Molten metal was found in the rubble of all three Towers.

In controlled demolitions of steel skyscrapers, the steel is cut using thermite.  In a thermite reaction, aluminum powder reacts with iron oxide to produce temperatures hot enough to melt steel.  The byproducts are molten iron and aluminum oxide gas.

Professor Steven Jones has identified the molten metal as molten iron from a thermate reaction.  Thermate is a patented form of thermite with added sulphur, used in the controlled demolition industry.


This could be aluminum oxide coming from the ends of the shredded columns,
consistent with the columns having been cut with thermite.


The Official Theories





(This page is not yet finished)

To read more about 9/11, check out these websites: