The distinctive and crucial
feature in the study of man is the concept of action. Human action is defined as purposeful behaviour. All conscious humans are constantly
acting. The purpose of a man's act is
his end or goal; the desire to
achieve this end is the man's motive for instituting the action. He will use scarce means to achieve ends.
The Axiom of Human Action is that human beings have
ends that they act to attain.
Even when a man is not
physically doing anything, he is choosing to do nothing to satisfy a certain
end, and is therefore acting.
It is from this axiom that
the entire body of Austrian economics is deduced. That is to say, it is a category (the
best-developed subdivision) of praxeology.
Consider the relationship
between praxeology and other disciplines:
The essence of human action
is the transforming of elements of the
actor’s environment into a new, more satisfactory arrangement.
With reference to any given
act, the environment may be divided into two parts
Human action therefore requires
the employment of means to achieve ends.
Our brains are constantly making means-ends calculations.
Means are by definition scarce, since if a given means was abundant, it would not be considered by
the brain when making calculations about ends and means. In daily life, air is abundant – available
anywhere with no effort – but water is scarce because some effort needs to be
made to attain it. Air does enter our
daily means-ends calculations, but water does.
Air is therefore part of the general conditions, whereas water is a
means, to be economized.
Means are referred to as goods,
and they can be divided into two distinct types:
For example, to satisfy the
end of eating a ham sandwich, the ham sandwich at the point it is about to be
eaten is the consumers good. Action is
required to transform elements of the environment to produce the ham sandwich at the desired place. Labor is required to transform the ham and
bread in the kitchen into a ham sandwich in the hands of the consumer. This requires various producers’ goods: ham-in-the-kitchen,
bread-in-the-kitchen, a knife to slice the ham, labor energy to make the
sandwich and deliver it, and also time and land-as-standing-room. These goods, which are transformed directly into
the consumers’ good by the action, are called 1st-order producers’ goods.
Many of these 1st-order
producers’ goods are themselves produced beforehand, with the help of other
producers’ goods. These producers’ goods
are in turn called higher-order
producers’ goods. In this case, the
bread has arrived in the fridge through being bought and carried home. Thus, bread-in-retail shop, along with labor,
land and time, are second-order producers’ goods.
Thus, any process (or structure) of production may be analyzed
as occurring in different stages. In the
earlier (or higher) stages, producers’ goods must be produced that will later
co-operate in producing other producers’ goods that will finally co-operate in
producing the desired consumers’ good.
In a developed economy, the structure of production can be very complex
and involve many stages of production.
Each stage of production requires time. Each stage also requires more than one factor of production.
Factors of production (other
than time) can be divided into two classes:
The original factors – labor
and nature – are required at the every stage of production. Capital goods are not required. For any capital good, if we were to trace
each stage of production back, we would eventually find the first stage, where
only labor and nature are used as factors of production.
Also required for human
action are:
The fact that humans are
constantly acting implies that all humans are constantly dissatisfied with the
current arrangement of their environment.
They come up with ends to transform their environment to make their circumstances
more to their satisfaction.
Since time is scarce, and
men have various ends, they must choose
between them. That is, they must choose
to act towards achieving some ends and foregoing others. This implies that at any given moment, every
human being has a dynamic rank of preference – or scale of values. The ends that
a man values the highest on his ordinal scale (given his calculations regarding
the means required to achieve them) are those he will act to achieve.
Men may, and often do, later
find that an action was not worth doing.
Usually, we learn from experiences like this how to choose better ends,
or how to use means more effectively to achieve our goals. For example, if you went to see a movie which
turned out be dull; now you wish you’d stayed at home and watched TV. But at the time the choice was made, going
out to watch that movie must have been at the top of the value scale.
An important implication of
the Axiom of Human Action for the fields of ethics and politics is that human
action can only be undertaken by individual "actors". Only individuals have ends and can act to
attain them. There are no such things as ends of or actions by
"groups", "collectives" or "States" which do not
take place as actions by various specific individuals.
A fundamental and constant truth about human action is that man prefers his ends to be achieved in the shortest possible time. The sooner any specific end is attained, the better. Thus with any given end, the shorter the period of production, the better. The duration of serviceableness of the consumers’ good also is an important consideration when choosing actions.
>>> Next Page: 2. The Subjective Theory of Value