Let us suppose that Crusoe,
while exploring the island, comes across another shipwrecked individual named
One type is violence. Crusoe may decide to kill
Violence could result in the
following developments:
a) Inconclusive fighting, with neither opponent the
victor, in which case the decision to commit violence will have been erroneous
and peace may be declared, with both
parties returning to isolation.
b) The victor could kill the victim and return to
isolation.
c) The victor could rob the victim and leave, possibly
to return later and rob again, in which case there is alternation between
robbery and isolation.
None of these three
developments establish a continuing relationship between Crusoe and Jackson.
d) A hegemonic
relationship could develop between the victor (who becomes the master) and
the victim (who becomes the slave).
Crusoe, by the use of a continual threat of violence, forces
Any continuing pattern of
interpersonal relationships between individuals is called a society.
But there are good reasons
why Crusoe might refrain from using violence:
A free market society is one where no individual may initiate violence against another individual. In other words, all exchanges in a free market are made voluntarily. We shall postpone our study of the effects of involuntary exchanges - interventions - until a later chapter.
>>> Next Page: 2. Voluntary Exchange