Government loans and subsidies to businesses distort
production. A subsidy or grant directly
penalizes taxpayers and distorts the structure of production away from where it
maximizes consumers’ satisfaction, and towards the chosen industry. It tends to prevent inefficient producers in
that industry from going bankrupt, thus they continue to waste resources.
A government loan to a business, so long as it is
paid back and the borrower increases his profits as a result of the loan, while
it will still distort the economy towards the tastes of the government
bureaucrat, will not be wasted resources and the structure of production will indeed
have been improved. However, government
loans are far less likely to be paid back than private loans.
If, say, a farmer, would like a loan to buy a tractor
and increase his productivity, but he is unable to get a loan in the market,
perhaps because he has bad credit, it is argued that a loan from government can
help him get started and all will benefit from his increased productivity. This overlooks the fact that the reason he
could not get a loan on the market was because he was considered too great a
risk. More than likely, he will make
inefficient use of the tractor and will not be able to pay back the loan, and
therefore the loan by the government would have been a waste of resources and
destructive to the structure of production.
Capital is scarce, and the private sector tends to
allocate capital in the most productive (profitable) way possible. If a loan is not granted by the private
sector, then it has been judged to be not the best use of capital or resources.
Investors are cautious about what to do with their
own money (capital). Government, on the
other hand, is “investing” other people’s money and this makes them willing to
take risks they would not take with their own money. It leads to favoritism, as governments can
pick and choose which industries, and which corporations and individuals, they
want to lend money to. They are not
restrained by the risk of not getting a favorable return on their investment. Government loans will waste far more capital
and resources than private loans, and will hence lower productivity.
While the inefficient farmer may be able to improve
his individual productivity, what is not seen is what might have been produced
if the loan had been a private one, and hence given to someone more likely to make
better use of the capital.