2. The Peel Act Structure (1844-1922)
The system had enabled the bankers to achieve their
second objective, the removal on the market limits to fractional reserve
banking. The formal structure of a
central bank, acting as cartel manager for commercial banks practicing
fractional reserve banking, was formalized in 1844 with the Peel Act.
The Peel Act granted the Bank of England an absolute
monopoly on bank notes. These notes
became legal tender, and must be accepted in the payment of debts. Now, no commercial bank was allowed to create
bank notes (which could circulate as money substitutes), only deposit slips,
containing the name of their depositor.
This meant that, in order to acquire Bank notes demanded by the public,
the banks had to keep a reserve account at the central bank. This eliminated the threat of outsiders
entering the industry and operating an honest bank, which may threaten the stability
of the fractional reserve banking cartel.
They had finally created a closed banking system.
If an outsider did enter the market, he would be
invited into the cartel and invited to practice fractional reserve banking,
which had now been officially legalized by government. This way, the central bank could ensure that
all banks expand and contract together, as they would all have – by mutual
agreement – the same “reserve requirement” – say 10%. A bank was free to keep a higher reserve, but
there was no reason for them to do so – they would not be maximizing their
profits. A 100% reserve bank would not
be granted an account at the central bank, and hence could not operate to any
extent, and its profits would be minute compared to the profits of the banks in
the cartel. Up against such a system,
100% reserve banking became a thing of the past.
Now, as well being the main creditor of government
debt, the central bank had enormous power over the money supply. The post-Peel Act banking system was organized
as two inverted pyramids:
The Bank of England could control the whole system,
by changing the reserve requirements, or by simply setting an interest rate for
the cost of borrowing Notes from the bank (which a commercial bank will do if
gets low on reserves). By adjusting their interest rate, they could ensure
that banks will do likewise, so the economy can be expanded or contracted at
will by the Bank of England. This
increased power to inflate created much more serious business cycles than
happened before the structure was formally created in 1844. Business cycles work to the benefit of those
who create them – the controllers of the money supply. By buying stocks when they are low, then creating
a credit boom, they can be sold at exaggerated profits. When the economy busts, those very same
stocks can be bought back again a fraction of the price.
For the rest of the 19th century, the
banking system functioned mostly as planned.
Faith in the redeemability of Bank of England notes ensured their
continued use. The early receivers of
the newly created money disproportionately benefited at the expense of the late
receivers of the new money, including foreign trading partners. The central bank, the commercial banks, and
their labor and landowners, benefited the most.
The government also benefited enormously. Over the longer term, everyone suffers from
decreased productivity for satisfying consumer wants.
The Central Bank meanwhile positioned itself as the
“lender of last resort”. That is, if any
commercial banks go bankrupt, the central bank will provide emergency funds to
prevent a collapse of the system. This
greatly increased confidence in the Notes and the banking system in general.